|
Felix Stalder via nettime-l on Fri, 16 Oct 2026 14:20:47 +0200 (CEST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: <nettime> Can an on-chain record become artistic material?
|
- To: nettime-l@lists.nettime.org
- Subject: Re: <nettime> Can an on-chain record become artistic material?
- From: Felix Stalder via nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 14:20:10 +0200
- Authentication-results: nettime.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lists.nettime.org header.i=@lists.nettime.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=1NXChOZq; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=openflows.com header.i=@openflows.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=npomail header.b=ws+UEa0S; dkim-atps=neutral
- Autocrypt: addr=felix@openflows.com; keydata= xsBNBFI7WkMBCADw9Z0NZWwx9qIGxy/bcH4HmrvjDT9KENComy23fZwsmqDbUGJ+TqElqJ42 +qA6QO4x9Wcam8Q5LHbZaEQv5a/zgkQXIW+vaXY7HWLhONI0G9mjiUqyxUFgIin50eYrB80u E+582q22byr1cTtRCKEgHWYNsbAmmJNQyAr9ue/TChDZ68WVRkMQGkaFHggWsaF1ykmBUAUN T6cmu2S1Dm58Dss2VDPy2V/U6biivHcuk/Wv7duNMp1CIZJe6bglB2K+wIoZ6Cl8PmcZfh6O geYkmq72WCN7r1NU4zlAHPjpPw0gG9IagPagzckxajfkl8cLBmOPeuqMzBx6ucux4Yh5ABEB AAHNI0ZlbGl4IFN0YWxkZXIgPGZlbGl4QG9wZW5mbG93cy5jb20+wsB4BBMBAgAiBQJSO1pD AhsjBgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRALu1uVDJ/yrN0SCACk5qTFlZcGMHgH hL+QV6d3GzEe9pEpdw+L920+58jbOPoLmtykL5p+WCNYlCBrA8v9t4AiD1DmofMlPZIY2fWO +ealUBx66IZ/uIYeP5p8chfCH0GiX4RuhFS3c4LNCJDdsjhquvaK0e+cTxCbpH8/VrT6FgFC +4Rc2Vrt9/gqZPM9TWKZchZVSC5Mj0PKtC58Rrs8G72OEzD31cvs/tt4KAwPepwYfwozHcS6 iSjxryKiUSxx1wMGx7cQ4201Sm/Tk2gMJGOeq7uYcK50MmWyUB7U6qJoM7FeH+xrENK4BLfG L9DncRKiDQYFMaS/Zo5KK8yx7wYZXT8Ay6s84EUczsBNBFI7WkMBCADECRcKfoD22HoS3mk4 qtsv5ibZT0AYi0opRFy844taL7VYVWYR/ltTcXGDapDrFW4AZCImzE3nYdm4S+RKFQP220TK lPrraovRaDkzhMGGlmx8WGoUqJ1GYkCjb2RaJ9QKIaSvf53nMVzsTQhNmVNK+ItxIubQqrGA FVxUJcAIqZkD2sIJmSc6hFzcPWEutHZrbuQ4br6WDzlSZkb8TygnKsFnYVmMkzdqrItjaemf emvSPG5CIC2Y8KdQeyErd8LE3hFDPJ5I/wIP4jRow8SOpMCzZhAee1Xv6uunA4/VsR7h6z5m /yK5MO/koiTBMCG8y1VVYfXMoImk6IYh/hbbABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkFAlI7WkMCGwwACgkQ C7tblQyf8qwImQgAgt+w20IMa0BaEGaClyWfCLteoEUHASHE4g+o5x96KfsdR/hx4ZonZBhO auI9kKdPSdBJI5nyQ6V1Fiy7NTLE0riFsAydutvMgRT5L8abZzLa7ue9T1iMyBTbcshRoJzD YlN4Jx0dyzlCtnBrGrZ8+RORi+ha6Fnr2WxyKLq6dpgG8CG8zRPa4kgTdNwEk/uF7wS6uqEp 3drsGoXdsJnULXSfFdWZOLNyYQxCxUMmzG9xuzjGmiCGj4V7XwhVHSprK0XDhjt5V5lIhc77 eB6FTRiAlOYvIQfyUV5OkYZ8+6sKUOF+yoXF4LL/ZP6IckOxCA528Apw0HHedcPApbjrlw==
- Cc: Felix Stalder <felix@openflows.com>
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 lists.servus.at 91B4D114BBB39
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.nettime.org; s=default; t=1792153239; bh=rPrjMbZNdTBKVdn70KpejFC3F7euGMYwEj5C5VMaS6o=; h=Date:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=1NXChOZq81gDBedyvWHg7EV5rbplik+3iFnFUbIAbMYwvSEM4P7zK7JoT5duZ10Xi 0ma/iJZgYFpZ+rYE5flL+2yk/zxAw3UG6eNXDNWlW4ePksfBRiBImKrlBdSQtbO11v t9K3tVuPgEZiaGbwFU93IpK+DG2o0dGLG6tLWoS4=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openflows.com; s=npomail; t=1792153216; bh=5PZ3c8fBkMIWeQKQKSmkzh0GHBBac9Q6GWscYRz293k=; h=MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ws+UEa0SzGUmopyAb7F05k3LNhENJZQXdveWOMMxwP/7DbV5xk0f9pO3iMIIQ2NZO 4nie7hEr+3c1x6qKMp2CuJWGdGR2/M71XrgTq+eI5Tob0OTK9hXIeAB9zQboZI+Jxg D98G2ZMlvV7XTsVhhJXcCBdVyKibhLrd+hU49Dg0=
- In-reply-to: <U0OjnTYZF8Y2aMpWkpthNRrC3XQUHBqUnjX_Aq6UDF7ifL1BPYmZT-76U95P7R08q8-a9GA3TCG4las0TKu31ObHasCbuFvn1Ahu8zlyvgM=@proton.me>
- References: <mayKMUDvzR7JKDWWyXFqi5Z7-qGZE6u-qKLtaJ9bJ2fwBwZ_j5knOQyE65J5H8AomG-Szh41BRSU_Q4nVB8tz5ojmROmSfVus4V5tw1y2og=@proton.me> <dc43c944-f0c5-45fb-b40f-9d257f4e0750@app.fastmail.com> <U0OjnTYZF8Y2aMpWkpthNRrC3XQUHBqUnjX_Aq6UDF7ifL1BPYmZT-76U95P7R08q8-a9GA3TCG4las0TKu31ObHasCbuFvn1Ahu8zlyvgM=@proton.me>
- Reply-to: "<nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets" <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
On 16/10/2026 11:00, Robert Cline via nettime-l wrote:
What interests me is the distinction between preserving an instant
and preserving the meaning attached to a particular date. Catch-22
seems to use the blockchain's unambiguous record to make that
distinction visible, rather than presenting it as a technical problem
to be solved.
And yes, the tension is arguably constructed, though I wonder whether
that construction is precisely where the conceptual gesture lies
The distinction and the resulting tension is fundamental to all
computing, which is never concerned with meaning (signs), but only with
data (signals) and the logical and/or statistical transformations of
these signals. There is no easy way of going from signal to the sign,
even if everyday practice suggest otherwise (because we usually
experience the world simultaneously through interrelated signals and signs).
The jaggedness of AI (sometimes great in terms of making sense,
sometimes terrible with no internal mechanism to differentiate between
the two) is where this become most visible at the moment.
What this gestured you propose does, though, in my view, is to highlight
the existence of different conventions within even within seemingly
technical domains (time keeping), UTC vs localized time.
all the best. Felix
--
| |||||||||||||||| http://felix.openflows.com |
| |||||||||| https://tldr.nettime.org/@festal |
| for secure communication, please use signal |
--
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org