|
Paul van der Walt via nettime-l on Fri, 16 Oct 2026 03:07:58 +0200 (CEST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: <nettime> Can an on-chain record become artistic material?
|
- To: nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- Subject: Re: <nettime> Can an on-chain record become artistic material?
- From: Paul van der Walt via nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 10:37:00 +0930
- Authentication-results: nettime.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lists.nettime.org header.i=@lists.nettime.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=LDdjhObA; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=denknerd.org header.i=@denknerd.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=m56T6glH; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=I7GmEoms; dkim-atps=neutral
- Cc: Paul van der Walt <paul@denknerd.org>
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 lists.servus.at 052E71150FA56
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.nettime.org; s=default; t=1792112869; bh=3SdrGCEuo7h8DIatWSBgOLVrdoBPF52eLUyXdwXozHQ=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=LDdjhObAnYv4fx/qCvriVYNL3SmkpUpEnKICWI8t8u09cXj4QZZecr7TFr7qcSyHM rgmhXy58Bn0UZcZ2U481E7h7s5VdrK/eqvYxUcZOpckqJ9WCK20fET60Utiw4wI958 AYRs4TULoeWoRL0+ubQNAmvdgn5NW/eX+Ee6+CxE=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denknerd.org; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1792112844; x=1792199244; bh=FRTn/qyvudNxlgxuIDVxiOcV0qlYVXwwS2+L93wmz/I=; b= m56T6glHyHZ3S31mTxp+siUIOFDnSWSDPFECEmVYxFpfQ6CoMXrqdM/94yGb5DN/ WnNtlvQgOtLZrVDQjmFjx4/NZmJbSSrQjUKJNKL6zVR3MP7YnMMOy0Zw/kzmVUwO eYzAUyeCnUSj1wcxpTRWa/z4gHXjB0jl+ETu/der1FH+r9r1zlVskuZNHMiz1sJZ uYrfSvH6YMPvE28NDDH01KaDJjGlTD1AGQKqCyy2OY+v56Ws1fgeTHFdQjBiwAHc +7Rq9h2R61FdvI+Fk1WtpNW+diXf/joE0WbHSzdaa6YEuyZ01Ios/mryJUYJUj58 E1m9H6Lz901WkbnObgwqAw==
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1792112844; x= 1792199244; bh=FRTn/qyvudNxlgxuIDVxiOcV0qlYVXwwS2+L93wmz/I=; b=I 7GmEoms8I9eU1bn20LU/hbOKEZ7wcNCvqNjUGJkfOPTqF3sAdfVUlCFMQsOpZHEH 9x5nxTYorDhA6T+u7Oqpt/n1jrNekiEM+GC3mwVGNkndBFUVQjASDazKTLrXzzhh gFHRScXmPf0F+Gc4DyHFwaEHCHTtg71LUgYmvRR/d3SRqxKG2SzPP3cu5hPuD7z+ 8yxLJhRqIppwqL9HzNK/NLENjxfA+bCIYEh9fUs3TqDPTRGUb+atm3IH8jaNGImX pxSX2TMg5YRWBiKE4XpcGimzeikYvUGxRGx9D1i+Ua6T0JLudXxC5LBjyD2OgxjM YIXG17qkywGLJylNIYRPQ==
- Dkim2-signature: i=1; m=1; t=1792112844; d=denknerd.org; mf=PHBhdWxAZGVua25lcmQub3JnPg==; rt=PG5ldHRpbWUtbEBsaXN0cy5uZXR0aW1lLm9yZz4=; s=fm1:rsa-sha256:nfkbKqhgPVogr+AqfE6On2FslyjlzkEbhV4ccVcGGYmp94r btuGZ+CUkyuEUR3o6mnSNfnswEahXi3O5u9j3bkYIsDTWC5MkZuOAT+72c02OTVY yzg517WKD+NNkCASGHkt5rbmTsOcUdIqKkzAH8hGEX5PhVyr6G9MyvYEqeLw15l+ eOKqWtwaxvqVEDDzy51gxQRXvKk6eWGGT4Tu5iBhp+VgchKPoBmTWpAOc4nz5z+G wQJDb1GmjAI9mD6q+I87BpUa1ZwpLKtLNkODRTTYdWFd4QOLmgBxxxyrYnM27AzM JBrBSU+bH73qMKQ9I8MLQgC+6BSvnYNnl4HV6BQ==;
- Feedback-id: ida814920:Fastmail
- In-reply-to: <mayKMUDvzR7JKDWWyXFqi5Z7-qGZE6u-qKLtaJ9bJ2fwBwZ_j5knOQyE65J5H8AomG-Szh41BRSU_Q4nVB8tz5ojmROmSfVus4V5tw1y2og=@proton.me>
- Message-instance: m=1; h=sha256:ftxgrgHRTmSHyNL6mffaPrKPY6LSkCHXhGkxSml1r50=:joYBboHeszgiA9GBqbsckdtI9M5yk6cp2BN1xUXtStY=;
- References: <mayKMUDvzR7JKDWWyXFqi5Z7-qGZE6u-qKLtaJ9bJ2fwBwZ_j5knOQyE65J5H8AomG-Szh41BRSU_Q4nVB8tz5ojmROmSfVus4V5tw1y2og=@proton.me>
- Reply-to: "<nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets" <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
Hi,
I risk excoriation for being "inculte" as the French would say, but i feel like this is a pretty artificial / self-imposed "tension" being drummed up for artistic merit. If we purposely encode things in one way, then choose to shift around our frame of reference... I don't know.
The question seems to boil down to "can we encode an Earth-wide instant", and clearly we can with a UTC timestamp (we might store it as int64 nanoseconds since the Unix epoch, as widely-accepted example). There's a difficulty with leap seconds but i suspect that's not what they're worried about here.
..or does this make me a humourless engineer? It can (and clearly does) provoke thought, so on that level i guess it has "artiness" (caveat emptor / IMHO / etc.). Curious to hear what the more credentialled among us might say.
Cheers,
A sceptical reader
On Fri, Oct 16, 2026, at 01:14, Robert Cline via nettime-l wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd be interested in hearing some critical perspectives on Catch-22, an
> on-chain conceptual artwork built around 22/2/22.
>
> Its Ethereum deployment has a single immutable timestamp, yet the same
> instant was February 22 in Los Angeles and February 23 in New York.
>
> The work interprets this tension between technical consensus and the
> human conventions through which time becomes meaningful.
>
> What I find interesting is how something as seemingly objective as a
> blockchain timestamp can acquire layers of meaning beyond its technical
> function when viewed through different frames of reference.
>
> I'm curious whether this holds up as a meaningful piece of conceptual
> art, and to what extent the blockchain itself contributes something
> artistically essential that a conventional timestamp wouldn't.
>
> I'd be interested in both skeptical and sympathetic readings.
>
> Best,
> Robert Cline
> --
> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> # more info: https://www.nettime.org
> # contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org
--
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org