| John Hopkins via nettime-l on Wed,  4 Oct 2023 04:55:35 +0200 (CEST) | 
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
	
	| Re: <nettime> FWD: The Copy Far "AI" license (fwd) | 
 
- To: nettime-l@lists.nettime.org
- Subject: Re: <nettime> FWD: The Copy Far "AI" license (fwd)
- From: John Hopkins via nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 20:55:08 -0600
- Cc: John Hopkins <jhopkins@neoscenes.net>
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 lists.servus.at 760BB1007C6B
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.nettime.org;	s=default; t=1696388129;	bh=fZUOFs5hvBcYsOy2cJTZxf97sG1YgGWSS2yrA2DFjJQ=;	h=Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:	 From;	b=u8j6C61DfsHUs3prRzuhYlZatmPaOQh8JEM0nGGt9em6AbeCdgNYI8oX096Cvqqjs	 5nDcbIGi6q6WjR4yS8iCLjFU1u+7jPBfXqjrrzgkqe8Zz+eJ90xYmRp+N3a5GBYV7m	 iUMnCAwh26uzWEFqIiZw1uQeO5iBcYLJgeTj9of4=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neoscenes.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID: Sender:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=V7/p76CrEWZAST715OBxkfSi4qd5NZcFMP/PnISNiZE=; b=WbiC6jV0yAyDzKdUiQ2dzaQ0Nx hZQ/bnJylibf51qkQ/luOyJIkO6F/iXQrSV6swrmUahHGvWHQVvn64fMbbP5nE3K1gC2ZHZcXEr5N lX0hP0Y/J1dgMLTpkfGYdofus9DwrmvZcdqFZpd82JabeJHbQDEGO73tbTAF+ntjkse5LztGqjY9i uK99wBpAaX3ttfK0WwhznqxlDuoN43sT4TZVdCOpceFw3B6BnqB4CfYiG5B+Hpz13l/7QaCGXlFF7 ozhfOPJVg/kOhBS/2+pE/5lOL4X51CHMF/DdnpLMOHAuyrgkkN3eWiynPJcbm2iY4x41ERL3I/b4f XhQtz+AA==;
- In-reply-to: <5091fc62-12a0-7f56-ef8c-8d420b72dc8b@swertz.org>
- Organization: neoscenes
- References: <f4531de7-5859-67d6-92bf-3eb37b7a1bd@ifi.uio.no> <806f27d5-c2ae-5fc0-e02a-33c9c08b3f15@swertz.org> <35800fb0-c33c-6600-a1a0-82c58be0ccec@aktivix.org> <9fca6e74-54c3-4064-bef9-ff13f302bc89@openflows.com> <d5732d6b-14bc-60d2-c1a6-a5cce7a3cafd@garyhall.info> <86c48d88-7cb9-0e09-1e0d-ff22787c3889@neoscenes.net> <5091fc62-12a0-7f56-ef8c-8d420b72dc8b@swertz.org>
- Reply-to: "<nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets" <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Of course, Christian, you can consider reality as whatever you want, although 
those considerations could send you in wildly problematic directions in terms of 
survival, it makes little difference to me and my framing of the reality that I 
observe, experience, and assume I am a part of. It's about surviving and 
thriving, at least to some degree. Taking the decision to interpret the world 
however you like might seem like autonomy until you realize that doing so 
radically shortens your existence because your 'choice' of worldview did not 
actually sync with the actual reality. So far the human species overall has many 
models, and no real conclusive evidences of ... anything.
You seem to be suggesting that you can do whatever you want despite the nature 
(of reality suggested by my model) of a connected and continuous field of flows. 
What you want, and how you act to fulfill those wants, would seem to have very 
connected ramifications to the proximal and distal world.
If you can frame a functional and holistic worldview that posits you as 
autonomous, free, and having no onerous connections to a wider reality that may 
impinge on that autonomy, a reality as a continuous field (that is, one that 
works to enhance at least a minimal level of survival and is comprehensible), 
I'm very interested to hear it. Perhaps you are thinking of Buddhism packaged in 
a closed box?
One only needs to articulate a worldview in order to compare/contrast with 
others in a social setting. Otherwise, no need to articulate, rather it is 
enough to simply 'be' (no matter how you imagine your autonomy from or your 
embeddedness in the operational reality).
JH
On 10/3/23 1:46 AM, Christian Swertz wrote:
And if I do not consider the nature of reality as a completely connected and 
continuous field of flows? Admittedly an autonomous decision - but nothing can 
keep me from thinking (and in most cases: acting) this way. I can't force 
anybody to do the same - but all people can take this decision, if they like, 
since all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights (at least 
in my perspective).
As far as I see, this freedom is incompatible with the concept of a connected 
and continuos field of flows. Don't you think so?
--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. John Hopkins, BSc, MFA, PhD
subscribe to the neoscenes blog::
https://neoscenes.net/blog/87903-subscribe-to-neoscenes
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org